Monday, 6 April 2009

'Fossils are so easily refutable.'

Fossils are so easily refutable. While I was outside, a briliant argument I thought of to refute fossil records.

Scientists have no idea what the fossils had gone through over the years. Humans, animals and weather could have all contributed to make it look like the fossil is a million years old.

I used a stick to help demonstrate it (I don't know if sticks can beocome fossilized, but it is just for a demonstartion). I can take stick right now, and I can manipulate it, to make it look like it is 50,000, 100,000, 1 million years old. Then after I did that, it became fossilized. Now 10 years, 100 yars, 500 years, 6000 years, 10,000 years later, evolution scientists will find that fossil and determine it is 1 million years old, becuase I made it look like it was 1 million years old. But realy it is only 10 years old, 100 years old, 500 years old, 6000 years old, or 10,000 years old.

There are so many ways I can find to make sure there is not one trace of human evidence on it, that would give away that I manipulated the stick.

So, who knows what could have contributed to the other fossils that would make them appear that they are millions of years old, yet they are only a few thousand years old.

Archaeleon



......>>

Sometimes, just sometimes, there really is nothing you can say...

I find myself wondering just where this guy went to school, that he thinks scientists 'look' at fossils to determine their age. When I was at school, we were told all about the dating methods used.

Apparently, this guy wasn't.

2 comments:

Psychodiva said...

is he a Merkin? that would explain it if he is :)

Sean the Blogonaut F.C.D. said...

Facepalm is the only answer, or perhaps several well aimed palm hand strikes to his face?